Scandal
and Sunlight - What the John Jay Study Means to Catholics
Remarks of James E. Post
President, Voice of the Faithful
St. Patrick and St. Anthony's RC Church, Hartford, CT
March 11, 2004
Introduction
On February
27, 2004, American Catholics learned the terrible truth: The sexual
abuse of children by clergy was not an isolated problem, but a systemic
problem.
The study that
was commissioned by America's Catholic bishops and conducted by
researchers from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice provided
some staggering findings:
-
Four percent
of all clergy over a fifty year period were the subject of allegations
of sexual abuse. Allegations had been filed against 4,392 priests,
a number twice the previous high estimate. In some dioceses,
the percentage of priests against whom allegations were made
exceeded 7% (Boston).
-
10,667 victims
were counted, many having been abused more than once; and,
-
Dioceses
have paid out more than $572 million to settle cases, treat
abusers, and pay attorneys.
These figures
exceed previous estimates. And, we still have to acknowledge the
problems of possible under-reporting (no audited verification) and
financial settlements that were made after the reporting deadline
(e.g., Boston's $85 million settlement in December 2003).
This data debunks
the idea that the sexual abuse crisis is a figment of the media's
imagination, as Vatican officials have suggested, or that the problem
was only in Boston.
The facts have
disproved the myths. Nearly ever one of the 195 dioceses in the
United States has had a significant number of abusers; has received
complaints from dozens -even hundreds-- of victims; and has expended
substantial financial resources to compensate victims, treat offenders,
and relocate abusers to new settings.
The research
shows, beyond a reasonable doubt, that clergy sexual abuse is not
an isolated event. This is not a case of a few bad apples. There
are 4,392 "bad apples," to be sure. But there is also a rotten barrel
that has corrupted too many men and injured too many children and
young people. Clergy sexual abuse is the product of a culture of
clericalism that desperately needs to change.
Systemic problems
need systemic solutions. The corrupting elements of the clerical
culture are power, authority, privilege, and secrecy. The solutions
are participation, shared responsibility, respect for individuals,
and transparency. The Catholic Church needs the healing power of
"sunlight."
The Church cannot
be true to its moral mission while its priests commit horrible crimes
and its bishops cover up the evil deeds. Every bishop must provide
leadership through a commitment to correct the injustices of the
past, ensure safe environments for people of all age and gender,
and engage in hands-on efforts to change a failed culture.
It is time for
a cleansed Church; a renewed Church; a reformed Church. And we expect
our bishops and clergy to walk with every lay woman and man to make
it so.
As the National
Review Board's Robert Bennett said, "Ultimately, the crisis besetting
the Church is not a legal crisis, a media crisis, or a personnel
crisis, but a crisis of trust and faith; and it is only by the living
out of their faith by bishops, priests and the laity that the Church
will be able to regain trust and fulfill its mission." (p.10)
The National
Review Board (NRB) addressed the question "What can we do to ensure
that this never happens again?" Their answer begins, "…(I)n order
for the Church to achieve the goal set out by the bishops of 'restoring
the bonds of trust that unite us,' more must be done, through a
process that involves both transparency and substantial participation
by the laity." (p.11)
The NRB recommends
(1) enhanced screening, formation, and oversight of candidates for
the priesthood; (2) increased sensitivity in responding to the allegations
of abuse; (3) greater accountability of bishops and other church
leaders; (4) improved interaction with civil authorities; and (5)
meaningful participation by the Christian faithful in the Church.
["The bishops and other Church leaders must listen to and be responsive
to the concerns of the laity." p.12]
Our Church --all
of us-- must pledge to reach out to every survivor of abuse --those
we know and those we do not yet know-- to assist them in dealing
with the effects of abuse. We must learn everything possible from
this tragedy, and apply those lessons to the problem of sexual abuse
in our society. We have been given an opportunity to lead, to provide
models of how to prevent abuse in all institutions, and we have
a moral obligation to do so. But we must begin by cleaning up our
own house - punish the guilty, love the abused, and insist on change.
We have come
a far distance in two years. But it is not nearly enough. The days
of being passive "people in the pews" must end. There is a practical
reason for all of us to recognize this need.
If every action
the bishops have pledged to take in the Charter and Norms works
perfectly, and no child is ever again abused in the Catholic Church,
survivors of abuse will still live among us for the next six, seven,
or eight decades. This issue will define the Catholic Church of
the 21st Century. History will judge us by how well we learn the
lessons from this tragedy, reflect on their meaning, and apply our
knowledge to the living Church of the 21st Century. That is the
only way we can reclaim the integrity of the Catholic Church.
PRACTICAL
STEPS
I am confident
that Hartford's Archbishop, Henry Mansell, is deeply concerned about
these issues. Every bishop must be concerned. I am sure that he
understands that his credibility with the people of this archdiocese
depends on how he, and all Catholic bishops, respond to this crisis.
If the archbishop
was here, I would tell him exactly what I am about to tell you.
First, reach
out to the good, decent people of this archdiocese in a campaign
of prayer and action. Use this Lenten season bring bishops, clergy,
and laity together; recognize our mutual betrayal and our shared
pain; and listen to one another in a new spirit of openness to Christ's
message expressed through the voice of each person, whatever their
circumstances and means.
Second, pledge
to the people of this archdiocese a determination to be open and
transparent in all financial matters.
Third, work
together to ensure that all parishes have elected parish councils
and finance councils that are healthy, representative, and involved
in the real work of building vital parishes and communities. The
presence of laity on personnel committees would have prevented the
movement of predators from place to place.
Fourth, open
discussions with survivors and members of the laity about the long
term needs of survivors that must be met through sustained programs
of assistance, therapy, and support.
Bishops have
emphasized the importance of reaching financial settlements with
victims of abuse. We should do so. We should also make longer term
commitments to therapy and other forms of support. There will be
people in need among the survivors of clergy sexual abuse for decades
to come. There is a need -and an opportunity-for Catholic communities
to think about -and to model-- the long term healing and reconciliation
process.
Sexual abuse
is not something that a survivor can be "put behind him/her" … it
shapes a lifetime. No survivor has ever told me they were "better
off" for having been abused. We know the story is always told the
other way … a life that has been altered, that can never again be
innocent. The recent death of Patrick McSorley, a victim of Fr.
John Geoghan, is sad testimony to the psychological and physical
damage that flows from sexual abuse.
Bishop accountability
We have learned
that more than 700 priests have been removed from active ministry
during the past two years. We ask why the bishops didn't act before
2002. The John Jay study puts the numbers in front of us; the National
Review Board has focused on the dual nature of the crisis: sexual
abuse of minors by clergy and the "failure of too many Church leaders
to respond appropriately to that abuse." (p. 7)
Now, we must
ask:
Were our bishops
asleep at the switch, or just too eager to keep the wraps on a scandal
by dealing with each case as it arose? We need an accounting from
each bishop in each diocese.
Why do some
bishops still refuse to release the names of priests against whom
allegations have been made? This behavior allows potential abusers
-predators- to walk free in our communities. And, it taints all
priests because reasonable people are suspicious and unable to trust
any priest as long as those against whom allegations have been made
remain unidentified.
Bishop Gregory
said at his February 27th press conference: "The terrible history
recorded here today is history." Is this history? I think Bishop
Gregory is wrong, and the jury is still out on that count!
Do we hope this
will become history? Yes. Do we believe it to be so now? No.
We know that
there is more painful and disturbing news to be confronted. Consider
the ugly and disgusting story that has emerged from Springfield,
MA. This is not only the story of a priest who abused young men.
It is a story of cover up, concealment, and deception over the course
of many years.
This is a story
of a bishop who covered up the story of his abuse, and may well
have covered the tracks of other stories of abuse. How far does
this go? Networks of priests engaged in sexual abuse? Were church
leaders blackmailed by abusive priests? The possible scenarios are
endless, and ugly.
The news that
Bishop Timothy McDonnell has been appointed to lead the Springfield
diocese is a hopeful sign. (To be installed April 1, 2004) We pray
for him; we offer our welcome and we express our desire to work
together to clean up the dreadful situation that awaits him.
We also note
the appointment of Bishop Robert J. McManus to head the Diocese
of Worcester, MA. (To be installed May 14, 2004) We also pray for
him; we offer our welcome and we express our desire to work together
to address the many issues facing that diocese.
In Springfield
and Worcester, as in the Archdiocese of Hartford, there are hundreds
-thousands- of talented lay women and men who are eager to help
lead their Church/our Church in the 21st Century.
Since 2002,
dozens of new bishops have been appointed to dioceses throughout
the United States. In New England, new archbishops have been appointed
to the archdioceses of Hartford and Boston. Bishops have also been
appointed to the dioceses of Norwich, CT; Portland, ME; Worcester,
MA; Springfield, MA; Fall River, MA. That is 7 dioceses with new
leadership.
We must work
to ensure that the leaders of these dioceses understand the new
realities of the Catholic Church. The laity has been abused, trust
has been lost, and there is no possibility of putting the "genie"
back into the bottle. Clericalism must end.
David O'Brien,
a historian at College of the Holy Cross, wrote a book some years
ago entitled, From the Heart of the American Church, in which he
examines the influence of Catholic education on American life by
interviewing dozens of prominent American Catholics. Michael Harrington,
an activist of another era, explained that his Jesuit education
had taught him two things: "Ideas have consequences, and, then,
you're responsible." Let me repeat that: Ideas have consequences,
and, then, you're responsible.
American Catholics
are the beneficiaries of two powerful sets of ideas. From our national
democratic tradition, we have learned that freedom is important;
that accountability is essential; and that free speech and the right
of assembly are fundamental rights. From our Catholic faith we have
learned that morality matters, that individual conscience is critical,
and that we bear a baptismal responsibility to work for the good
of our Church.
This is the
DNA we share as American Catholics. Like the double helix, these
ideas are entwined in our belief system and in our lives. We believe
in these ideas. And we believe in the values these ideas represent
… that makes us responsible to see that they become values in practice.
Over these past
two years, we have learned what it means -and what it takes-to be
a true American Catholic who believes in morality, accountability,
freedom, individual conscience, and Catholic responsibility. As
I said, "ideas have consequences. And, then, you're responsible."
Conclusion
How do we live
up to -and live out-our responsibility? There are several things
we can, and should, do.
First, we must
become educated about the crisis and how it came about. Then, we
must put our minds to the question of how to repair the Church.
Our command
is the command St. Francis received at the crumbled church of San
Damiano - "Francis, Repair my Church which is crumbling all around
you." It is appropriate that we close with those words tonight
in this Church where our Franciscan priests and brothers and sisters
are repairing and healing a broken world.
I want to leave
you with one last thought: We must read if we are to repair.
We must be more
knowledgeable about the crisis, the Church, and the many ideas now
emerging to shape the repair process. I have two recommended readings:
#1. The National
Review Board for the Protection of Children and Young People, "A
Report on the Crisis in the Catholic Church in the United States."
(February 27, 2004)
#2. Jim Muller
and Charles Kenney, Keep the Faith, Change the Church (Rodale Press,
2004). This book describes VOTF's early history -how we gathered,
formed, and began the journey that has come to Hartford this evening.
This is a wonderful story of how ordinary Catholics said "Stop!"
"This is not what our Church stands for." "We must speak out and
work to restore moral integrity to our Church."
You will love
it. Please order by going to VOTF website,
or Amazon.com, or your local bookstore.
And, now, I
would be pleased to take your questions. Thank you.
|