Mary Pat Fox
President, Voice of the Faithful
Dear Friends,
On Sunday June 24, Voice of the Faithful was featured in a New
York Times article .
The article talked about some challenges we face as a 5-year old
organization and also talked about an initiative
we are rolling out this summer. Let me clarify what we are doing
and not doing. The proposal developed by the Working Group for
Goal 2 and approved by the NRC and Officers was announced in In
the Vineyard April 19, 2007.
The proposal has two clear parts: one is a call for the Vatican to conduct an ecclesiastic review of celibacy in light of its suspected
linkage to clericalism and the culture of secrecy which allowed
the bishops to handle the clergy sex abuse crisis by moving abusive
priests from parish to parish. The other part of the proposal,
which each of you will be more involved in, is the discussion around
and research into the challenges of the priesthood today in the
21st Century. Here we will hopefully gain a better understanding
of how our gifts can best be used.
The relationship of mandated celibacy and the Clergy Sexual Abuse
Crisis is complicated. We must be clear that we are NOT saying
that the practice of celibacy causes men to abuse. Rather, we are
clearly stating that mandated celibacy is believed to have been
a significant contributor to the culture of secrecy that allowed
bishops to knowingly protect abusive priests. Mary Gail Frawley-O’Dea
articulates this very well in her new book Perversion of Power:
Sexual Abuse in the Catholic Church. She states: “What became
evident is that some number of priests and prelates – some
of them sexually active as well – turn a blind eye to the
chasm between celibacy as mandated and celibacy as lived. It is
the secrecy and hypocrisy about celibacy that supported other sexual
secrets like the abuse of minors by priests.”
Since our early days VOTF has stressed the importance of ensuring
that a crisis such as the clergy sex abuse crisis never happens
again. That is not new. However, we have learned a great deal about
what contributed to the abuse crisis. We now know it was not that
the Catholic Church was plagued with more child abusers than any
other organization. Rather what made our situation worse was how
the bishops handled the crisis. That culture of secrecy is still
alive and well. We encounter this culture of secrecy as we work
for financial accountability and are refused data; when we work
for changes in the laws and we run up against the “Catholic
Conference”; when dioceses declare bankruptcy and are later
found moving money around behind the scenes. This culture of secrecy
is a fundamental issue in how the bishops handle many issues including
the sex abuse crisis. We must get to the heart of what creates
this culture and we must change it.
The process to get to this point where we have taken on this initiative
has spanned nine- months and included many discussions. The NRC
went out to their constituencies and solicited input prior to taking
a vote. With each revision there was extensive conversation among
the Working Group, the Officers and members of the NRC. All these
groups made sure that the proposal was clearly defined, within
our mission statement and goals, before agreement was reached.
This initiative will be rolled out by the Working Group for Goal
2 with an official press release on July 2.
We must understand the underlying system that made it possible
for bishops to put children’s lives at risk in order to protect
the institution if we are ever going to effect real change. We
must continue to seek that truth. As we do we will engage in discussion
and debate and hopefully come up with more ways to build a healthier
Church. Cosmetic changes might make people feel better but without
removing the roots of the current crisis, those roots will remain
able to strike again.
Keep the Faith, Change the Church,
Mary Pat
|